Do you live in one of the most dangerous cities in South Dakota?
We all watch the news and see reports on Facebook of the latest crimes that happen in our hometowns. But it can be hard to tell at a big picture level how dangerous our town actually is.
No one wants to feel unsafe, and statistically speaking, odds are that where you live is most likely relatively safe. In order to help the good people of South Dakota — and anyone looking to move to South Dakota — know just how close they are to danger, we took data from the annual FBI report and did some serious analysis.
So what is the most dangerous city in South Dakota? After analyzing 28 cities in South Dakota, Rapid City takes the top spot as the most dangerous city in South Dakota based on the most recent FBI data.
For a detailed explanation of the data and analysis we used in creating this ranking, read on.
Or learn more about the safest places in South Dakota.
For more South Dakota reading, check out:
- 10 Best Places To Live In South Dakota
- These Are The 10 Best Counties To Live In South Dakota
- 10 Cheapest Places To Live In South Dakota
Graphing The Most Dangerous And Safest Places In South Dakota
The 10 Most Dangerous Places To Live In South Dakota For 2019
The 2nd most populated city in South Dakota, Rapid City is located just 30 minutes away from Mount Rushmore.
Rapid City’s crime problem has been slowly improving in recent years, with violent crime going down from 2015-17, and property crime dropping.
Still, Rapid City residents face about a 1 in 26.1 chance of being the victim of theft or arson.
Located in southeastern South Dakota, Mitchell ranks relatively poorly in both categories of crime.
On top of that, both types of crime have been steadily growing more frequent, with a 43% rise in violent crime and an 18% rise in property crime occurring between 2015-17.
That left Mitchell’s residents with a 1 in 179 shot of being the victim of violence in 2017.
The most populated city in South Dakota, the Sioux Falls metropolitan area contains almost 30% of the total population of the state.
The crime situation in Sioux Falls has gotten increasingly worse in recent years, with violent crime going up between 2015-17.
That meant that in 2017, about 1 in 222 Sioux Falls residents were the victim of a violent crime.
The second smallest state capital in America (after Montpelier, VT), Pierre has the 2nd worst rate of property crime in the state.
Though Pierre has the 7th most violent crime on this list.
Flandreau residents had a 1 in 122 chance of being the victim of a rape, murder, or assault in 2017 — the highest of any city in South Dakota for the year.
A city on the Missouri River, Yankton has experienced an unfortunate boom in its crime rate recently.
Between 2015-17, violent crime and property crime increased.
That left residents of Yankton with a 1 in 40.1 chance of being the victim of a property crime and a 1 in 255 chance of being the victim of violence in 2017.
Chamberlain may not be the worst place to live in South Dakota , but it does earn the title of the 7th most dangerous city in the state.
In 2017, residents of Chamberlain had a 1 in 236 chance of being raped, murdered or assaulted and a 1 in 43.8 chance of being the victim of theft or arson.
Chamberlain probably wouldn’t even be on this list if not for a very recent explosion in its crime rate — between 2015-17, instances of violent crime increased to 10 and instances of property crime went from just 13 in 2011 to 54 in 2017.
Spearfish has placed 4th for property crime per capita in the state.
Residents of Spearfish faced a 1 in 4th chance of being the victim of theft or arson in 2017.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, violent crime bumped up between 2015-17, making Spearfish the 12th most violent city in South Dakota.
Vermillion ranks as the 9th most dangerous city in South Dakota.
The sheer volume of people passing through Vermillion probably contributes to the high occurrence of violent crime within the city. There were 43 violent crimes in 2017.
Sturgis South Dakota has seen crime within its city limits head downwards over the last few years, but it’s still a relatively dangerous place.
Chances are if you live in Sturgis, someone you know was the victim of a break-in or theft in recent years, as nearly 1 in 32.5 residents had a run in with a criminal last year.
How Is Your Town In ?
How we determined the most dangerous cities in South Dakota for 2019?
Every year the FBI release two crime datasets, a preliminary dataset limited to the biggest cities in the country, followed by a more detailed release at the end of the year.
For our analysis, we focused on the JUST released 2017 data, specifically the 2017 Crime In The United States Report. We will update the results when data becomes available in September 2019.
So what criteria did we use? Have a look:
- Violent Crimes Per Capita
- Property Crimes Per Capita
In order to make the analysis as apples to apples as possible, we only considered cities over 2,000 in population. That left us with 28 cities in South Dakota.
We then ranked each city from 1 to 28 for the two criteria with a #1 ranking being the most dangerous for the particular criteria.
Next, we averaged the two rankings into one “Dangerous Index”.
Finally, we ranked every city on the “Dangerous Index” with the lowest index being the most dangerous in South Dakota — Rapid City.
Read on for a detailed look at the 10 most dangerous cities in South Dakota.
Locking It All Up In South Dakota
The latest FBI crime data shows that Rapid City ranks as the most dangerous city in South Dakota for 2019.
We want to point out again that there’s still safes places in Rapid City and that this isn’t a comment on the people that live there. So please don’t beat us up.
If you’re curious enough, here are the safest cities in South Dakota:
- Lead (Pop. 2,990)
- Lennox (Pop. 2,364)
- Brandon (Pop. 10,090)
For more South Dakota reading, check out: