New Hampshire is one of those states that you don’t hear a lot about. Tucked away somewhere in New England, it’s the wealthy, quiet kid in the corner with the plaid shirt and who has all the good grades.
At least that’s the stereotype. That’s not such a bad way to be viewed is it?
It’s not an easy life for most of the year up there. But if you ask people who live there, they are fiercely protective of their state. They stick together up there, and would probably rather you stay out. Unless you’re on vacation.
But is it all great in the Granite State? Of course not. Just like every other state, New Hampshire has its trouble spots. The purpose of this post is to use science and data to determine which cities in New Hampshire are the least desirable to live in.
Of course, many of the cities on this list would rank highly if they were in other states. But nonetheless, according to science, these cities are the worst places you could possibly live if you make New Hampshire your home.
After analyzing 25 of the state’s most populous cities (over 5,100 people), we came up with this list as the 10 worst places to live in New Hampshire:
- Laconia (Photos)
- Rochester (Photos)
- Franklin (Photos)
- Suncook (Photos)
- Berlin (Photos)
- Manchester (Photos)
- Claremont (Photos)
- Somersworth (Photos)
- Concord (Photos)
What? Where are these places you wonder? And before you get all riled up and say we’re picking on small town America, that’s not the case.
We understand there’s a lot of good in every place.
However, according to data (which doesn’t measure things like beauty and ‘friendly people’), there are far better options in the state for making a place home. And the worst place to live in New Hampshire? That would be Laconia.
Read on below to see how we crunched the numbers and see how your city fared in 2019.
For more New Hampshire reading, check out:
- 10 Best Places To Live In New Hampshire
- 10 Cheapest Places To Live In New Hampshire
- 10 Most Dangerous Cities In New Hampshire
How we determined the worst places to live in New Hampshire for 2019
To figure out how bad a place is to live in, we only needed to know what kinds of things people like and then decide what cities have the least amount of those things.
We don’t think it’s a stretch to assume that people like the following things:
- Good education
- Lots of jobs
- Low crime
- Low poverty
- Nice homes
- High incomes
- High population density (Lots of things to do)
- Short work commutes
- Health insurance
We broke crime down into violent crime and property crime to give violent crime a larger weight — if you did a simple calculation of all crimes per capita, property crimes are normally 7x more common and really bias that ranking.
Furthermore, only cities with at least 5,000 people were considered — leaving 25 cities.
We then ranked each city from 1 to 25 for all the criteria with a #1 ranking being the worst for the particular criteria.
Next, we averaged the rankings into one “Worst Place To Live Score”.
Finally, we ranked every city on the “Worst Place To Live Score” with the lowest score being the worst city in New Hampshire — Laconia. Read on for a detailed look at the 10 worst cities in New Hampshire.
This list is a scientific analysis based on real data and is completely unbiased.
Little Laconia, New Hampshire could use a big hug right now. Sure, it’s a beautiful place, sandwiched between Lakes Winnisquam and Winnipesaukee. But the crime here is horrible. In fact, Laconia is the most dangerous place you can live in New Hampshire.
Chatter on forums indicate Laconia hasn’t recovered from a mini economic collapse to the area, and that Laconia is a ‘little run down’. And while crime might be centered around some of the many cultural events that happen in this vacation spot, the fact remains it’s just not safe, overall.
There were two murders here in 2017, and residents had a 1 in 28.6 chance of being the victim of a property crime.
Additionally, employment numbers (5.8% unemployment rate) and income levels are far below the state average ($52,702).
Most of the rest of the cities on this list deserve to be on here due to their high crime numbers. Rochester is the 5th most dangerous city in New Hampshire, according to the FBI. Residents had a 1 in 30.1 chance of being the victim of a property crime. That’s really high for New Hampshire, but not even the highest in the state.
Home values are the 4th cheapest in the state, and income levels are almost as low as you can get. Households in Rochester bring in just under $55,767 a year annually.
Rochester is also on Route 16 just north of Portsmouth.
Now we can get to some actual cities that might have some normal numbers. In this case, Franklin ranks high mainly due to the low economic numbers. Homes are the 3rd cheapest in the state here at $160,100. Say what you want about low cost of living. What the data says is that cheaper homes means less demand. And there isn’t a lot of demand to live in Franklin.
The median income levels here are the 4th lowest in the state of New Hampshire, at $48,398. Crime is above average, but not horrible like some of the cities we’ll talk about in a minute. And the unemployment rate, while far lower than the national average, is high for New Hampshire. Almost 4.7% of people in Franklin were without jobs according to the latest numbers.
Franklin is right off of I-93 north of Concord.
Yes, every dog has a few fleas. But the crime in Suncook is actually quite atrocious. Some of the punks there who are causing trouble need a time out. It’s that simple.
Residents here have a 1 in 122 chance of being the victim of a violent crime, meaning raped, attacked or murdered. And they have a 1 in 17.5 chance of being robbed each year. That’s off the charts high.
And the unemployment rate is at 5.6%, which isn’t horrible, but the 5th-highest in the state. Plus, residents here earn about $62,855 a year in combined household income.
When you’re looking at the worst places you could live in New Hampshire, Berlin came in 5th. Let’s see why.
When you’re comparing the unemployment rate to the rest of the nation, New Hampshire residents are very hard workers. But when comparing the unemployment rate among cities in New Hampshire, you can see some really big differences. In Berlin, the number of people out of work is 8.9%
In New Hampshire, that’s the 1st highest in the state.
The residents in Berlin have the 1st lowest incomes in the state. Folks in Berlin average $37,969 a year. Which isn’t too shabby in comparison to the other ‘lowest’ income cities in most other states.
Additionally, the homes are valued at $90,400 on average. That’s the 1st lowest in the state. The population has dropped about 15% in the last 15 years. Perhaps these numbers are part of the reason for the Berlin flight.
As one commenter said in City-Data: “Berlin is as run down looking as it gets after a WW-2 vintage bombing attack.”
Maybe there’s a reason they opened a prison there.
Berlin is on Route 16 on the northern side of Mount Washington.
The largest city in New Hampshire is also one of its most dangerous. No surprises there. But that still isn’t an excuse. In looking at the latest FBI data, Manchester is the third-most dangerous place in the state.
Manchester saw four murders two years ago, and you have a 1 in 25 chance of having something stolen from you here.
Additionally, the schools spend the least amount of money per student than anywhere else in the state. But the ratio per student ($12,761) is still on par with the national average. That says a lot about how great the public schools are in New Hampshire.
The unemployment rates and income levels are also far below average in comparison to the rest of the state.
The main reason Claremont makes it high on this list has to do with the low household incomes and home prices. Residents earn about $46,639 a year, and homes average $132,500.
Crime is also far above the state average. And while the locals say Claremont is a ‘little gritty’, apparently Claremont is working to rebuild its image.
According to the chatter we’ve read on forums, this ranking is valid. People complain about drug dealing, sex clubs and other nefarious behavior. Fact is, Somersworth is the second most dangerous city you can live in New Hampshire.
There’s a lot of Section 8 housing here, and apparently, you have to stay away from certain areas of downtown. There was a murder in town in 2017, and you have a 1 in 25 chance of being the victim of a robbery, most likely a car or home break in. Yikes.
The fact remains there are far better options if you want to commute into Portsmouth.
Rank Last Year: 9 (No Change)
Median Home Value: $218,700 (13th worst)
Unemployment Rate: 5.0% (10th worst)
More on Hudson: Data
Welcome to Hudson, New Hampshire, where 1 in 20.0 people is without a job, and families bring in a combined $65,536 a year.
Crime is the 6th highest in New Hampshire, where you have a 1 in 30.7 chance of being the victim of a property crime, and every year, you have a 1 in 294 chance of being raped, attacked or murdered when you’re within Hudson city limits.
Concord, part of Merrimack County, is the 10th worst place to live in New Hampshire for 2017.
. Residents here earn almost the lowest salaries per year relative to any other residents in the state at $61,310, and crime 13th worst in New Hampshire.
Additionally, the poverty level is 10.2% in Concord.
Wrapping Up The Worst In New Hampshire
If you’re looking at areas in New Hampshire with the worst economic situations, where there’s higher than average crime, and not a lot to do, this is an accurate list.
And in the end, Laconia ranks as the worst city to live in New Hampshire for 2019.
If you’re curious enough, here are the best cities to live in New Hampshire:
- Durham (Pop. 10,753)
- Portsmouth (Pop. 21,644)
- Hanover (Pop. 8,495)
For more New Hampshire reading, check out:
- These Are The 10 Best Places To Retire In New Hampshire
- These Are The 10 Richest Cities In New Hampshire
- 10 Safest Places In New Hampshire
- 10 Best Cities For Singles In New Hampshire
Detailed List Of The Worst Places To Live In New Hampshire