The 10 Worst St. Paul Suburbs For 2021

The 10 Worst St. Paul Suburbs To Live For 2021

We'll get the ball rolling with Lexington, the absolute worst place to live around St. Paul according to the data.

And in the world of worst rankings, Lexington beat the competition pretty handily thanks to scoring in the bottom 15% in three major categories. Income is the 5th worst in the St. Paul area, and to make matters worse, the city ranks 3rd worst when it comes to home values.

But hey, at least it's cheap to live there. But there's a reason for that... it's Lexington.

You won't feel bad about not having a great income for the area, there aren't a bunch of places to spend your money anyway.

Welcome to Newport. Home to KMart, Big Lots, and a lot of gas stations.

This city is 7.3 miles to St. Paul. Income levels here are the 9th lowest in the metro area, where families bring in about $59,167 a year, which doesn't go a long ways even on a shoestring budget.

But on the bright side, there are a lot of fast food joints in the area.

Back up the highway we go for the third worst St. Paul suburb you can live in. You might have expected to see Brooklyn Center on here. While the cost of living is low, your entertainment and work options are limited. And that's an understatement.

In terms of numbers, it's in the worst 15% for insurance, and the adult high school drop out rate is poor compared to other St. Paul suburbs.

But at least there are nice parks to bring the kids during the day.

If you live in Somerset, most likely you struggle to make ends meet every month. It ranks as the 19th lowest St. Paul suburb when it comes to residents making money.

Not only that, but this is the 7th worst unemployed suburb you can live in if you choose to live near St. Paul. Remember, we looked at 99 cities for this study.

Somerset is about 24.3 miles to downtown.

West St. Paul has the distinction of being a St. Paul suburb. Which means that's about all it has going for it.

All snarkiness aside, West St. Paul has the 14th lowest home values in the metro St. Paul area, where the median price is $199,400. To put that into perspective, in North Oaks, the median income is $178,816, which is the best in the area.

West St. Paul has an unemployment rate of 6.32% which ranks 2nd worst.

Columbia Heights has 20,118 residents that probably know it's a pretty crummy place to live when you look at the data. (Or, if you've ever been there, you don't need to look at the data.)

Incomes are towards the bottom and the poverty rate sits at 12.038942138806643%.

Ah, Fridley. You rank as the 7th worst place to live around St. Paul.

It's the place with the 2most out of work residents in the St. Paul metro area (4.1%).

Little Canada is a city about 5.2 miles from St. Paul, but St. Paul probably wishes it was further away. It ranks as the 8th worst burb for 2018.

You'd be hard pressed to find a worse place to live. Little Canada has the 16th most uninsured people, worst incomes, and has the 25th highest unemployment rate (3.94%) in the entire St. Paul metro area.

Homes only cost $242,500 for a reason. That's cheap for St. Paul standards.

If you absolutely have to live near St. Paul, then Maplewood might be a place for you to consider as it's only the 9th worst St. Paul suburb.

About 4.29% of residents are out of work.

Rounding out the ten worst St. Paul suburbs to call home is Minneapolis.

Located 8.1 miles outside the city, Minneapoliss is a real pit when you look at the data. Its residents have the 8th highest unemployment rate (5.08%), and poverty is far above the area average.