Worst Portland Suburbs For 2020

We used science and data to determine which Portland suburbs are the real pits.

Join RoadSnacks
Editor’s Note: This article is an opinion based on facts and is meant as infotainment. Don’t freak out we updated this article for 2020. This is our sixth time ranking the worst suburbs around Portland.

Swipe left for slideshow. Article continues below.

Not everyone is cut out for city life. Some people would prefer to live in the cities and towns that surround Portland.

So the question arises, do the suburbs maintain a semblance of the larger-than-life appeal of their more famous neighbor?

Today, we'll use science and data to determine which Portland 'burbs need a little tender loving care - the sore thumbs of the Portland area if you will. Realistically, you can't expect all the suburbs to live up to Portland proper, although Sherwood certainly tries.

Of course, not all suburbs of Portland are created equally, which is precisely why we set out to find the best ones. So without further ado...

We examined the 36 biggest suburbs of Portland to find out the worst places to live. And while you won't necessarily find them on the worst places to live in oregon lists, these ten places are a little too far downwind of Portland in terms of quality of life.

Here are the 10 worst suburbs around Portland for 2020:

  1. Columbia
  2. Woodburn (Photos)
  3. St. Helens (Photos)
  4. Woodland
  5. Hubbard (Photos)
  6. Gresham (Photos)
  7. Forest Grove (Photos)
  8. Vancouver
  9. Newberg (Photos)
  10. Cornelius (Photos)

What's the worst suburb of Portland? Columbia ranks as the worst suburb of Portland for 2020 based on the most recent Census and FBI data.

Read on to see how we determined the places around Portland that need a pick-me-up. And remember, don't blame the messenger.

Or, if you're thinking of moving to elsewhere in oregon check out the best places in oregon overall or the worst.

And remember, there are some good places to live around Portland too.

Editor's Note: If you see a slight difference between the worst in state rankings and this suburb ranking, it's because of the methodology. We needed a way to include more places, so we eliminated crime and commute times as criteria for this analysis.

For more Oregon reading, check out:

The 10 Worst Portland Suburbs To Live For 2020

1. Columbia

Columbia Location In Pennsylvania

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 10,389
Rank Last Year: 1 (No Change)
Median Income: $39,019 (1st lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.1% (3rd highest)
Median Home Value: $102,800 (1st lowest)
More on Columbia:

We'll get the ball rolling with Columbia, the absolute worst place to live around Portland according to the data.

And in the world of worst rankings, Columbia beat the competition pretty handily thanks to scoring in the bottom 15% in three major categories. Income is the 1st worst in the Portland area, and to make matters worse, the city ranks 1st worst when it comes to home values.

But hey, at least it's cheap to live there. But there's a reason for that... it's Columbia.

You won't feel bad about not having a great income for the area, there aren't a bunch of places to spend your money anyway.

Woodburn, OR

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 25,417
Rank Last Year: 2 (No Change)
Median Income: $46,690 (2nd lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 5.6% (10th highest)
Median Home Value: $179,400 (2nd lowest)
More on Woodburn:  Data | Photos

Welcome to Woodburn. Home to KMart, Big Lots, and a lot of gas stations.

This city is 28.7 miles to Portland. Income levels here are the 2nd lowest in the metro area, where families bring in about $46,690 a year, which doesn't go a long ways even on a shoestring budget.

But on the bright side, there are a lot of fast food joints in the area.

St. Helens, OR

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 13,446
Rank Last Year: 3 (No Change)
Median Income: $48,311 (3rd lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 6.4% (8th highest)
Median Home Value: $206,800 (3rd lowest)
More on St. Helens:  Data | Photos

Back up the highway we go for the third worst Portland suburb you can live in. You might have expected to see St. Helens on here. While the cost of living is low, your entertainment and work options are limited. And that's an understatement.

In terms of numbers, it's in the worst 15% for insurance, and the adult high school drop out rate is poor compared to other Portland suburbs.

But at least there are nice parks to bring the kids during the day.

4. Woodland

Woodland, WA

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 5,912
Rank Last Year: 6 (Up 2)
Median Income: $61,818 (12th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.4% (1st highest)
Median Home Value: $223,500 (5th lowest)
More on Woodland:

If you live in Woodland, most likely you struggle to make ends meet every month. It ranks as the 12th lowest Portland suburb when it comes to residents making money.

Not only that, but this is the 1st worst unemployed suburb you can live in if you choose to live near Portland. Remember, we looked at 36 cities for this study.

Woodland is about 26.8 miles to downtown.

Hubbard, OR

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 3,399
Rank Last Year: 8 (Up 3)
Median Income: $56,184 (5th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.1% (4th highest)
Median Home Value: $215,300 (4th lowest)
More on Hubbard:  Data | Photos

Hubbard has the distinction of being a Portland suburb. Which means that's about all it has going for it.

All snarkiness aside, Hubbard has the 4th lowest home values in the metro Portland area, where the median price is $215,300. To put that into perspective, in Sherwood, the median income is $124,968, which is the best in the area.

Hubbard has an unemployment rate of 7.06% which ranks 4th worst.

Gresham, OR

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 110,770
Rank Last Year: 4 (Down 2)
Median Income: $52,303 (4th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 6.9% (6th highest)
Median Home Value: $267,000 (14th lowest)
More on Gresham:  Data | Photos

Gresham has 110,770 residents that probably know it's a pretty crummy place to live when you look at the data. (Or, if you've ever been there, you don't need to look at the data.)

Incomes are towards the bottom and the poverty rate sits at 19.169904465877405%.

Forest Grove, OR

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 23,923
Rank Last Year: 10 (Up 3)
Median Income: $59,902 (8th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.3% (2nd highest)
Median Home Value: $280,500 (17th lowest)
More on Forest Grove:  Data | Photos

Ah, Forest Grove. You rank as the 7th worst place to live around Portland.

It's the place with the 2nd most out of work residents in the Portland metro area (7.31%).

8. Vancouver

Vancouver, WA

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 178,413
Rank Last Year: 7 (Down 1)
Median Income: $58,865 (7th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 6.0% (9th highest)
Median Home Value: $260,400 (10th lowest)
More on Vancouver:

Vancouver is a city about 7.3 miles from Portland, but Portland probably wishes it was further away. It ranks as the 8th worst burb for 2018.

You'd be hard pressed to find a worse place to live. Vancouver has the 7th most uninsured people, 7th worst incomes, and has the 9th highest unemployment rate (6.01%) in the entire Portland metro area.

Homes only cost $260,400 for a reason. That's cheap for Portland standards.

Newberg, OR

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 23,167
Rank Last Year: 12 (Up 3)
Median Income: $56,599 (6th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 4.5% (18th highest)
Median Home Value: $283,500 (19th lowest)
More on Newberg:  Data | Photos

If you absolutely have to live near Portland, then Newberg might be a place for you to consider as it's only the 9th worst Portland suburb.

About 4.54% of residents are out of work.

Cornelius, OR

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 12,575
Rank Last Year: 11 (Up 1)
Median Income: $62,786 (13th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 4.8% (16th highest)
Median Home Value: $235,800 (6th lowest)
More on Cornelius:  Data | Photos

Rounding out the ten worst Portland suburbs to call home is Cornelius.

Located 19.5 miles outside the city, Corneliuss is a real pit when you look at the data. Its residents have the 16th highest unemployment rate (4.78%), and poverty is far above the area average.

Determining The Worst Suburbs Around Portland for 2020

To figure out how bad a place is to live in, we only needed to know what kinds of things people like and then decide what cities have the least amount of those things.

We threw a lot of criteria at this one in order to get the best, most complete results possible. Using the most recent American Community Survey data from 2014-2018, this is the criteria we used:

  • High unemployment rate
  • Low median household incomes
  • Low population density (no things to do)
  • Low home values
  • A lot of high school drop outs
  • High poverty
  • High rate of uninsured families

FYI: We defined a suburb as being within 30 miles of Portland.

Additionally, we limited the analysis to places that have over 2,000 people. This left us with a grand total of 36 suburbs to evaluate around Portland.

We ranked each place with scores from 1 to 36 in each category, where 1 was the "worst".

Next, we averaged the rankings for each place to create a quality of life index.

And finally, we crowned the city with the worst quality of life index the "Worst Suburb near Portland." We're lookin' at you, Columbia. You can download the data here.

Read on below to learn more about what it's like to live in the worst of the worst. Or skip to the end to see the list of all the suburbs ranked from worst to best.

The areas around Portland where the dream is more of a nightmare for 2020

Well there you have it -- the worst of the 'burbs surrounding Portland with Columbia casting itself ahead of the pack.

As we mentioned earlier, the suburbs around Portland aren't all bad. Sherwood takes the cake as the best place to live around Portland.

  • Sherwood
  • Lake Oswego
  • West Linn

For more Oregon reading, check out:

Detailed List Of The Worst Portland Suburbs

Rank City Population Median Income Median Home Values
1 Columbia 10,389 $39,019 $102,800
2 Woodburn 25,417 $46,690 $179,400
3 St. Helens 13,446 $48,311 $206,800
4 Woodland 5,912 $61,818 $223,500
5 Hubbard 3,399 $56,184 $215,300
6 Gresham 110,770 $52,303 $267,000
7 Forest Grove 23,923 $59,902 $280,500
8 Vancouver 178,413 $58,865 $260,400
9 Newberg 23,167 $56,599 $283,500
10 Cornelius 12,575 $62,786 $235,800
11 Molalla 9,082 $61,185 $245,000
12 Estacada 3,270 $60,893 $266,600
13 Troutdale 16,559 $72,188 $282,500
14 Gladstone 12,045 $61,045 $274,300
15 Beaverton 97,012 $68,586 $352,000
16 Battle Ground 19,932 $70,774 $263,200
17 Sandy 10,834 $64,296 $259,700
18 Hillsboro 104,730 $78,144 $315,100
19 Fairview 9,303 $64,656 $265,100
20 Canby 17,527 $66,433 $298,000
21 Milwaukie 20,955 $63,421 $291,300
22 Scappoose 7,125 $79,401 $273,800
23 Tigard 52,368 $75,795 $375,100
24 Wilsonville 23,418 $69,043 $404,800
25 Tualatin 27,338 $81,118 $397,300
26 Dundee 3,219 $77,656 $289,100
27 La Center 3,172 $90,278 $319,900
28 Washougal 15,484 $87,283 $295,600
29 Oregon 10,215 $80,385 $246,400
30 North Plains 2,427 $84,737 $329,400
31 Camas 22,615 $106,513 $403,800
32 Ridgefield 7,178 $95,859 $369,700
33 Happy Valley 19,471 $124,968 $485,900
34 West Linn 26,511 $104,061 $465,000
35 Lake Oswego 38,705 $100,461 $603,800
36 Sherwood 19,337 $103,592 $388,800

How Is Your Town In ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *