More and more people would prefer to live in the cities and towns that surround Sacramento to avoid all the hustle and bustle.
So the question arises: what suburbs of Sacramento are the worst?
Today, we’ll use Saturday Night Science to determine which Sacramento ‘burbs need a little tender loving care – the sore thumbs of the Sacramento area if you will. Realistically, you can only expect some of the suburbs to live up to Sacramento proper, although Rocklin certainly tries.
We examined the 15 biggest suburbs of Sacramento to find out the worst places to live. And while you won’t necessarily find them on the worst places to live in California lists, these ten places are a little too far downwind of Sacramento in terms of quality of life.
Table Of Contents: Top Ten | Methodology | Summary | Table
The 10 worst suburbs around Sacramento for 2025
Now don’t freak out.
What’s the worst suburb of Sacramento? Rancho Cordova ranks as the worst suburb of Sacramento for 2025 based on the most recent Census and FBI data.
Or, if you’re thinking of moving to elsewhere in California check out the best places in California overall or the worst.
And remember, there are some good places to live around Sacramento too.
The 10 Worst Sacramento Suburbs To Live For 2025
/10
Population: 80,656
Median Income: $89,120 (6th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.0% (3rd highest)
Median Home Value: $532,717 (4th lowest)
More on Rancho Cordova: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
We’ll get the ball rolling with Rancho Cordova, the absolute worst place to live around Sacramento according to the data.
And in the world of worst rankings, Rancho Cordova beat the competition pretty handily thanks to scoring in the bottom 15% in three major categories. Income is the 6th worst in the Sacramento area, and to make matters worse, the city ranks 4th worst when it comes to home values.
But hey, at least it’s cheap to live there. But there’s a reason for that… it’s Rancho Cordova.
You won’t feel bad about not having a great income for the area. There aren’t a bunch of places to spend your money anyway.
/10
Population: 10,002
Median Income: $86,970 (3rd lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 11.4% (highest)
Median Home Value: $464,243 (lowest)
More on Rio Vista: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
Welcome to Rio Vista. Home to KMart, Big Lots, and a lot of gas stations.
This city is 30.0 miles to Sacramento. Income levels here are the 3rd lowest in the metro area, where families bring in about $86,970 a year, which only goes so far even on a shoestring budget.
But on the bright side, there are a lot of fast food joints in the area.
/10
Population: 54,496
Median Income: $90,791 (7th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 5.2% (8th highest)
Median Home Value: $526,150 (3rd lowest)
More on West Sacramento: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
Back up the highway we go for the third worst Sacramento suburb you can live in. You might have expected to see West Sacramento on here. While the cost of living is low, your entertainment and work options are limited. And that’s an understatement.
In terms of numbers, it’s in the worst 15% for insurance, and the adult high school dropout rate is poor compared to other Sacramento suburbs.
But at least there are lovely parks to bring the kids during the day.
/10
Population: 87,036
Median Income: $77,167 (lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.0% (4th highest)
Median Home Value: $470,003 (2nd lowest)
More on Citrus Heights: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
If you live in Citrus Heights, most likely you struggle to make ends meet every month. It ranks as the lowest Sacramento suburb for median household incomes.
Not only that, but this is the 4th worst unemployed suburb you can live in if you choose to live near Sacramento. Remember, we looked at 15 cities for this study.
Citrus Heights is about 13.2 miles to downtown.
/10
Population: 61,256
Median Income: $87,880 (5th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 5.3% (7th highest)
Median Home Value: $546,899 (6th lowest)
More on Woodland: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
Woodland has the distinction of being a Sacramento suburb. Which means that’s about all it has going for it.
All snarkiness aside, Woodland has the 6th lowest home values in the metro Sacramento area, where the median price is $546,899. The median income is $139,263.
Woodland has an unemployment rate of 5.34% which ranks 7th worst.
/10
Population: 25,665
Median Income: $86,327 (2nd lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.2% (2nd highest)
Median Home Value: $533,979 (5th lowest)
More on Galt: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
Galt has 25,665 residents that probably know it’s a pretty crummy place to live when you look at the data. (Or, if you’ve ever been there, you don’t need to look at the data.)
Incomes are towards the bottom, and the poverty rate sits at 7.287703471268876%.
/10
Population: 19,158
Median Income: $98,798 (8th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 3.4% (14th highest)
Median Home Value: $602,286 (7th lowest)
More on Dixon: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
Ah, Dixon. You rank as the 7th worst place to live around Sacramento.
It’s the place with the 14th most out of work residents in the Sacramento metro area (3.43%).
/10
Population: 7,453
Median Income: $132,650 (14th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 2.2% (15th highest)
Median Home Value: $610,118 (8th lowest)
More on Winters: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
Winters is a city about 27.5 miles from Sacramento, but Sacramento probably wishes it was further away. It ranks as the 8th worst burb for 2018.
You’d be hard-pressed to find a worse place to live. Winters has the most uninsured people, 14th worst incomes, and has the 15th highest unemployment rate (2.18%) in the entire Sacramento metro area.
Homes only cost $610,118 for a reason. That’s cheap for Sacramento standards.
/10
Population: 66,801
Median Income: $87,421 (4th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 5.6% (6th highest)
Median Home Value: $837,456 (14th lowest)
More on Davis: Data | Crime | Cost Of Living
If you absolutely have to live near Sacramento, then Davis might be a place for you to consider as it’s only the 9th worst Sacramento suburb.
About 5.58% of residents are out of work.
/10
Population: 6,809
Median Income: $103,435 (9th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 4.3% (12th highest)
Median Home Value: $932,487 (15th lowest)
More on Loomis: Data | Cost Of Living
Rounding out the ten worst Sacramento suburbs to call home is Loomis.
Located 22.3 miles outside the city, Loomiss is a real pit when you look at the data. Its residents have the 12th highest unemployment rate (4.31%), and poverty is far above the area average.
Methodology: Determining The Worst Suburbs Around Sacramento for 2025
To figure out how bad a Sacramento suburb is to live in, we used Saturday Night Science to identify the kinds of things people like and then decide what suburbs have the least amount of those things.
Using the most recent American Community Survey data from 2019-2023, this is the criteria we used:
- High unemployment rate
- Low median household incomes
- Low population density (no things to do)
- Low home values
- A lot of high school dropouts
- High poverty
- High rate of uninsured families
We defined a suburb as any town within 30 miles of Sacramento.
We also limited the analysis to places with over 6,000 people. This left us with a grand total of 15 suburbs to evaluate around Sacramento.
We ranked each place with scores from 1 to 15 in each category, where 1 was the “worst.”
Next, we averaged the rankings for each place to create a quality-of-life index.
And finally, we crowned the city with the worst quality of life index, the “Worst Suburb near Sacramento.” We’re looking at you, Rancho Cordova.
We updated this article for 2025, which reflects our tenth time ranking the worst suburbs around Sacramento.
Summary: The areas around Sacramento where the dream is more of a nightmare for 2025
Well there you have it — the worst of the ‘burbs surrounding Sacramento with Rancho Cordova casting itself ahead of the pack.
The worst suburbs of Sacramento are .
As we mentioned earlier, the suburbs around Sacramento aren’t all bad. Rocklin takes the cake as the best place to live around Sacramento.
- Rocklin
- Folsom
- Roseville
For more California reading, check out:
- Best Places To Live In California
- Cheapest Places To Live In California
- Most Dangerous Cities In California
- Best Places To Retire In California
- Richest Cities In California
- Safest Places In California
- Worst Places To Live In California
Detailed List Of The Worst Sacramento Suburbs
| Rank | City | Population | Median Income | Median Home Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rancho Cordova | 80,656 | $89,120 | $532,717 |
| 2 | Rio Vista | 10,002 | $86,970 | $464,243 |
| 3 | West Sacramento | 54,496 | $90,791 | $526,150 |
| 4 | Citrus Heights | 87,036 | $77,167 | $470,003 |
| 5 | Woodland | 61,256 | $87,880 | $546,899 |
| 6 | Galt | 25,665 | $86,327 | $533,979 |
| 7 | Dixon | 19,158 | $98,798 | $602,286 |
| 8 | Winters | 7,453 | $132,650 | $610,118 |
| 9 | Davis | 66,801 | $87,421 | $837,456 |
| 10 | Loomis | 6,809 | $103,435 | $932,487 |
| 11 | Elk Grove | 177,221 | $122,229 | $636,883 |
| 12 | Lincoln | 51,629 | $108,108 | $641,859 |
| 13 | Roseville | 152,438 | $117,354 | $641,653 |
| 14 | Folsom | 82,140 | $139,263 | $758,685 |
| 15 | Rocklin | 72,340 | $120,916 | $683,061 |
If Sacramento county is not near the worst places in the US to live, following after Placer county, the inarguable far worst, then its hard to find a worse place in the country, possibly the world for that matter. Consider that the chance of falling victim to serious property crime is almost 100 percent, meaning, in mathematical terms, that half the population are criminal. There is not doubt that criminality is strongly favored and the law compliance is apt to get you in trouble with the law or to have a gun pulled on you by police or taken down with injury by police. And example of life in unincorporated “Sac” County would be 14 burglaries and grand thefts over 5 years including $4000 riding tractor mower, $800 lawnmowers, $600 landscape equipment, $1200 window smash theft, $1300 dual door smash (sans lock sets), $2,500 semitrailer vehicle theft, $2100 Tech Ring theft, $100+ classic bike and $300 new bike in carton thefts; and on an one plus (in three days) $4000+ motorcycle, $1200 garage door theft by destroy (to remove motorcycle) $60 gas storage container, plus $265 hydraulic table and left if constant fear/vigilance due to removal of all protections and assurance the thieves will return to get what was left behind…oh and didd I mention $10,000 to replace 300+ foot destroyed fence….yes all of that including fence in three weeks to one Sacramento residence. Or how about a Sac Physician (UCDavis) filing perjured statements to Social Security an cutting off retiree/disabled social security for over 4 months after deliberately inflicting ten of thousands of personal and property injury on a patient and relatives plus causing relative to be arrested and prosecuted for doing what the law demands…and there is not recourse because physician/hospiital criminality is immunized from the state penal code and from civil liability. Sound like a good place to live? The by all means come to Sacramento County or its neighbor Placer County, California. Oh, and don’t worry about you kids having it too tough in school…at schools that provide the lowest quality education–and functional illiteracy to boot–of any other state in the U.S.
Forgive the typo’s, but that, too, tells you what it is like to live there…in fear and totally on your own for protection.
I am a Sacramento resident, and this article could not be more wrong.