Worst Sacramento Suburbs For 2020

We used science and data to determine which Sacramento suburbs are the real pits.

Join RoadSnacks
Editor’s Note: This article is an opinion based on facts and is meant as infotainment. Don’t freak out we updated this article for 2020. This is our sixth time ranking the worst suburbs around Sacramento.

Swipe left for slideshow. Article continues below.

Not everyone is cut out for city life. Some people would prefer to live in the cities and towns that surround Sacramento.

So the question arises, do the suburbs maintain a semblance of the larger-than-life appeal of their more famous neighbor?

Today, we'll use science and data to determine which Sacramento 'burbs need a little tender loving care - the sore thumbs of the Sacramento area if you will. Realistically, you can't expect all the suburbs to live up to Sacramento proper, although Folsom certainly tries.

Of course, not all suburbs of Sacramento are created equally, which is precisely why we set out to find the best ones. So without further ado...

We examined the 15 biggest suburbs of Sacramento to find out the worst places to live. And while you won't necessarily find them on the worst places to live in california lists, these ten places are a little too far downwind of Sacramento in terms of quality of life.

Here are the 10 worst suburbs around Sacramento for 2020:

  1. Rancho Cordova
  2. West Sacramento (Photos)
  3. Dixon (Photos)
  4. Woodland (Photos)
  5. Galt
  6. Citrus Heights (Photos)
  7. Rio Vista (Photos)
  8. Winters (Photos)
  9. Loomis (Photos)
  10. Lincoln (Photos)

What's the worst suburb of Sacramento? Rancho Cordova ranks as the worst suburb of Sacramento for 2020 based on the most recent Census and FBI data.

Read on to see how we determined the places around Sacramento that need a pick-me-up. And remember, don't blame the messenger.

Or, if you're thinking of moving to elsewhere in california check out the best places in california overall or the worst.

And remember, there are some good places to live around Sacramento too.

Editor's Note: If you see a slight difference between the worst in state rankings and this suburb ranking, it's because of the methodology. We needed a way to include more places, so we eliminated crime and commute times as criteria for this analysis.

For more California reading, check out:

The 10 Worst Sacramento Suburbs To Live For 2020

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 72,056
Rank Last Year: 1 (No Change)
Median Income: $63,221 (2nd lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 8.2% (2nd highest)
Median Home Value: $278,800 (2nd lowest)
More on Rancho Cordova:  Data

We'll get the ball rolling with Rancho Cordova, the absolute worst place to live around Sacramento according to the data.

And in the world of worst rankings, Rancho Cordova beat the competition pretty handily thanks to scoring in the bottom 15% in three major categories. Income is the 2nd worst in the Sacramento area, and to make matters worse, the city ranks 2nd worst when it comes to home values.

But hey, at least it's cheap to live there. But there's a reason for that... it's Rancho Cordova.

You won't feel bad about not having a great income for the area, there aren't a bunch of places to spend your money anyway.

West Sacramento, CA

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 52,826
Rank Last Year: 2 (No Change)
Median Income: $64,664 (4th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 8.0% (4th highest)
Median Home Value: $329,700 (5th lowest)
More on West Sacramento:  Data | Photos

Welcome to West Sacramento. Home to KMart, Big Lots, and a lot of gas stations.

This city is 4.4 miles to Sacramento. Income levels here are the 4th lowest in the metro area, where families bring in about $64,664 a year, which doesn't go a long ways even on a shoestring budget.

But on the bright side, there are a lot of fast food joints in the area.

Dixon, CA

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 19,759
Rank Last Year: 2 (Down 1)
Median Income: $77,203 (9th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 7.1% (5th highest)
Median Home Value: $357,800 (7th lowest)
More on Dixon:  Data | Photos

Back up the highway we go for the third worst Sacramento suburb you can live in. You might have expected to see Dixon on here. While the cost of living is low, your entertainment and work options are limited. And that's an understatement.

In terms of numbers, it's in the worst 15% for insurance, and the adult high school drop out rate is poor compared to other Sacramento suburbs.

But at least there are nice parks to bring the kids during the day.

Woodland, CA

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 59,044
Rank Last Year: 5 (Up 1)
Median Income: $64,122 (3rd lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 5.7% (10th highest)
Median Home Value: $345,000 (6th lowest)
More on Woodland:  Data | Photos

If you live in Woodland, most likely you struggle to make ends meet every month. It ranks as the 3rd lowest Sacramento suburb when it comes to residents making money.

Not only that, but this is the 10th worst unemployed suburb you can live in if you choose to live near Sacramento. Remember, we looked at 15 cities for this study.

Woodland is about 16.8 miles to downtown.

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 25,675
Rank Last Year: 4 (Down 1)
Median Income: $73,555 (8th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 8.2% (3rd highest)
Median Home Value: $297,100 (3rd lowest)
More on Galt:  Data

Galt has the distinction of being a Sacramento suburb. Which means that's about all it has going for it.

All snarkiness aside, Galt has the 3rd lowest home values in the metro Sacramento area, where the median price is $297,100. To put that into perspective, in Folsom, the median income is $109,762, which is the best in the area.

Galt has an unemployment rate of 8.15% which ranks 3rd worst.

Citrus Heights, CA

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 87,061
Rank Last Year: 5 (Down 1)
Median Income: $59,008 (1st lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 6.7% (7th highest)
Median Home Value: $274,600 (1st lowest)
More on Citrus Heights:  Data | Photos

Citrus Heights has 87,061 residents that probably know it's a pretty crummy place to live when you look at the data. (Or, if you've ever been there, you don't need to look at the data.)

Incomes are towards the bottom and the poverty rate sits at 12.023226819357221%.

Rio Vista, CA

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 8,618
Rank Last Year: 8 (Up 1)
Median Income: $70,000 (6th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 8.8% (1st highest)
Median Home Value: $322,400 (4th lowest)
More on Rio Vista:  Data | Photos

Ah, Rio Vista. You rank as the 7th worst place to live around Sacramento.

It's the place with the 1st most out of work residents in the Sacramento metro area (8.77%).

Winters, CA

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility


Population: 7,132
Rank Last Year: 7 (Down 1)
Median Income: $84,153 (12th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 6.8% (6th highest)
Median Home Value: $358,600 (8th lowest)
More on Winters:  Data | Photos

Winters is a city about 27.5 miles from Sacramento, but Sacramento probably wishes it was further away. It ranks as the 8th worst burb for 2018.

You'd be hard pressed to find a worse place to live. Winters has the 7th most uninsured people, 12th worst incomes, and has the 6th highest unemployment rate (6.84%) in the entire Sacramento metro area.

Homes only cost $358,600 for a reason. That's cheap for Sacramento standards.

Loomis, CA

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 6,753
Rank Last Year: 9 (No Change)
Median Income: $70,671 (7th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 5.9% (9th highest)
Median Home Value: $370,700 (9th lowest)
More on Loomis:  Data | Photos

If you absolutely have to live near Sacramento, then Loomis might be a place for you to consider as it's only the 9th worst Sacramento suburb.

About 5.88% of residents are out of work.

Lincoln, CA

Overall SnackAbility


Population: 46,939
Rank Last Year: 11 (Up 1)
Median Income: $81,417 (10th lowest)
Unemployment Rate: 3.9% (14th highest)
Median Home Value: $416,800 (11th lowest)
More on Lincoln:  Data | Photos

Rounding out the ten worst Sacramento suburbs to call home is Lincoln.

Located 23.3 miles outside the city, Lincolns is a real pit when you look at the data. Its residents have the 14th highest unemployment rate (3.89%), and poverty is far above the area average.

Determining The Worst Suburbs Around Sacramento for 2020

To figure out how bad a place is to live in, we only needed to know what kinds of things people like and then decide what cities have the least amount of those things.

We threw a lot of criteria at this one in order to get the best, most complete results possible. Using the most recent American Community Survey data from 2014-2018, this is the criteria we used:

  • High unemployment rate
  • Low median household incomes
  • Low population density (no things to do)
  • Low home values
  • A lot of high school drop outs
  • High poverty
  • High rate of uninsured families

FYI: We defined a suburb as being within 30 miles of Sacramento.

Additionally, we limited the analysis to places that have over 6,000 people. This left us with a grand total of 15 suburbs to evaluate around Sacramento.

We ranked each place with scores from 1 to 15 in each category, where 1 was the "worst".

Next, we averaged the rankings for each place to create a quality of life index.

And finally, we crowned the city with the worst quality of life index the "Worst Suburb near Sacramento." We're lookin' at you, Rancho Cordova. You can download the data here.

Read on below to learn more about what it's like to live in the worst of the worst. Or skip to the end to see the list of all the suburbs ranked from worst to best.

The areas around Sacramento where the dream is more of a nightmare for 2020

Well there you have it -- the worst of the 'burbs surrounding Sacramento with Rancho Cordova casting itself ahead of the pack.

As we mentioned earlier, the suburbs around Sacramento aren't all bad. Folsom takes the cake as the best place to live around Sacramento.

  • Folsom
  • Rocklin
  • Davis

For more California reading, check out:

Detailed List Of The Worst Sacramento Suburbs

Rank City Population Median Income Median Home Values
1 Rancho Cordova 72,056 $63,221 $278,800
2 West Sacramento 52,826 $64,664 $329,700
3 Dixon 19,759 $77,203 $357,800
4 Woodland 59,044 $64,122 $345,000
5 Galt 25,675 $73,555 $297,100
6 Citrus Heights 87,061 $59,008 $274,600
7 Rio Vista 8,618 $70,000 $322,400
8 Winters 7,132 $84,153 $358,600
9 Loomis 6,753 $70,671 $370,700
10 Lincoln 46,939 $81,417 $416,800
11 Elk Grove 168,503 $90,770 $377,800
12 Roseville 133,049 $84,105 $420,100
13 Davis 67,988 $66,162 $622,900
14 Rocklin 63,127 $97,508 $452,100
15 Folsom 77,007 $109,762 $488,400

How Is Your Town In ?

2 thoughts on “Worst Sacramento Suburbs, 2020

  1. If Sacramento county is not near the worst places in the US to live, following after Placer county, the inarguable far worst, then its hard to find a worse place in the country, possibly the world for that matter. Consider that the chance of falling victim to serious property crime is almost 100 percent, meaning, in mathematical terms, that half the population are criminal. There is not doubt that criminality is strongly favored and the law compliance is apt to get you in trouble with the law or to have a gun pulled on you by police or taken down with injury by police. And example of life in unincorporated “Sac” County would be 14 burglaries and grand thefts over 5 years including $4000 riding tractor mower, $800 lawnmowers, $600 landscape equipment, $1200 window smash theft, $1300 dual door smash (sans lock sets), $2,500 semitrailer vehicle theft, $2100 Tech Ring theft, $100+ classic bike and $300 new bike in carton thefts; and on an one plus (in three days) $4000+ motorcycle, $1200 garage door theft by destroy (to remove motorcycle) $60 gas storage container, plus $265 hydraulic table and left if constant fear/vigilance due to removal of all protections and assurance the thieves will return to get what was left behind…oh and didd I mention $10,000 to replace 300+ foot destroyed fence….yes all of that including fence in three weeks to one Sacramento residence. Or how about a Sac Physician (UCDavis) filing perjured statements to Social Security an cutting off retiree/disabled social security for over 4 months after deliberately inflicting ten of thousands of personal and property injury on a patient and relatives plus causing relative to be arrested and prosecuted for doing what the law demands…and there is not recourse because physician/hospiital criminality is immunized from the state penal code and from civil liability. Sound like a good place to live? The by all means come to Sacramento County or its neighbor Placer County, California. Oh, and don’t worry about you kids having it too tough in school…at schools that provide the lowest quality education–and functional illiteracy to boot–of any other state in the U.S.

  2. Forgive the typo’s, but that, too, tells you what it is like to live there…in fear and totally on your own for protection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *