These Are The 10 Worst Stockton Suburbs For 2018

We used science and data to determine which Stockton suburbs are the real pits.

Join RoadSnacks

Swipe left for slideshow. Article continues below.

Not everyone is cut out for city life. Some people would prefer to live in the cities and towns that surround Stockton.

So the question arises, do the suburbs maintain a semblance of the larger-than-life appeal of their more famous neighbor?

Today, we’ll use science and data to determine which Stockton ‘burbs need a little tender loving care – the sore thumbs of the Stockton area if you will. Realistically, you can’t expect all the suburbs to live up to Stockton proper, although Brentwood certainly tries.

Of course, not all suburbs of Stockton are created equally, which is precisely why we set out to find the best ones. So without further ado…

We examined the 15 biggest suburbs of Stockton to find out the worst places to live. And while you won’t necessarily find them on the worst places to live in California lists, these ten places are a little too far downwind of Stockton in terms of quality of life.

Here are the 10 worst suburbs around Stockton for 2018:

  1. Modesto (Photos)
  2. Lathrop
  3. Galt
  4. Lodi (Photos)
  5. Riverbank (Photos)
  6. Oakdale (Photos)
  7. Manteca (Photos)
  8. Rio Vista (Photos)
  9. Antioch (Photos)
  10. Oakley (Photos)

Read on to see how we determined the places around Stockton that need a pick-me-up. And remember, don’t blame the messenger.

Or, if you’re thinking of moving to elsewhere in California check out the best places in California overall or the worst.

And remember, there are some good places to live around Stockton too.

Editor’s Note: If you see a slight difference between the worst in state rankings and this suburb ranking, it’s because of the methodology. We needed a way to include more places, so we eliminated crime and commute times as criteria for this analysis.

For more California reading, check out:

Determining The Worst Suburbs Around Stockton for 2018

To figure out how bad a place is to live in, we only needed to know what kinds of things people like and then decide what cities have the least amount of those things.

We threw a lot of criteria at this one in order to get the best, most complete results possible. Using the most recent American Community Survey data, this is the criteria we used:

  • High unemployment rate
  • Low median household incomes
  • Low population density (no things to do)
  • Low home values
  • A lot of high school drop outs
  • High poverty
  • High rate of uninsured families

FYI: We defined a suburb as being within 30 miles of Stockton.

Additionally, we limited the analysis to places that have over 7,000 people. This left us with a grand total of 15 suburbs to evaluate around Stockton.

We ranked each place with scores from 1 to 15 in each category, where 1 was the “worst”.

Next, we averaged the rankings for each place to create a quality of life index.

And finally, we crowned the city with the worst quality of life index the “Worst Suburb near Stockton.” We’re lookin’ at you, Modesto.

Read on below to learn more about what it’s like to live in the worst of the worst. Or skip to the end to see the list of all the suburbs ranked from worst to best.

1. Modesto

Modesto, California

Source: Public domain

Population: 208,512
Unemployment Rate: 13.6%
Median Home Price: $208,000
Median Income: $50,996
More on Modesto: Data | Jobs

We’ll get the ball rolling with Modesto, the absolute worst place to live around Stockton according to the data.

And in the world of worst rankings, Modesto beat the competition pretty handily thanks to scoring in the bottom 15% in three major categories. Income is the 1st worst in the Stockton area, and to make matters worse, the city ranks 1st worst when it comes to home values.

But hey, at least it’s cheap to live there. But there’s a reason for that… it’s Modesto.

You won’t feel bad about not having a great income for the area, there aren’t a bunch of places to spend your money anyway.

2. Lathrop

Population: 20,331
Unemployment Rate: 10.9%
Median Home Price: $250,400
Median Income: $65,699
More on Lathrop: Data | Jobs

Welcome to Lathrop. Home to KMart, Big Lots, and a lot of gas stations.

This city is 11.1 miles to Stockton. Income levels here are the 10th lowest in the metro area, where families bring in about $65,699 a year, which doesn’t go a long ways even on a shoestring budget.

But on the bright side, there are a lot of fast food joints in the area.

3. Galt

Population: 24,848
Unemployment Rate: 10.5%
Median Home Price: $239,000
Median Income: $63,681
More on Galt: Data | Jobs

Back up the highway we go for the third worst Stockton suburb you can live in. You might have expected to see Galt on here. While the cost of living is low, your entertainment and work options are limited. And that’s an understatement.

In terms of numbers, it’s in the worst 15% for insurance, and the adult high school drop out rate is poor compared to other Stockton suburbs.

But at least there are nice parks to bring the kids during the day.

4. Lodi

Lodi, California

Population: 63,842
Unemployment Rate: 9.7%
Median Home Price: $252,900
Median Income: $51,139
More on Lodi: Data | Jobs

If you live in Lodi, most likely you struggle to make ends meet every month. It ranks as the 2nd lowest Stockton suburb when it comes to residents making money.

Not only that, but this is the 7th worst unemployed suburb you can live in if you choose to live near Stockton. Remember, we looked at 15 cities for this study.

Lodi is about 10.1 miles to downtown.

5. Riverbank

Riverbank, California

Population: 23,761
Unemployment Rate: 12.0%
Median Home Price: $219,700
Median Income: $61,870
More on Riverbank: Data | Jobs

Riverbank has the distinction of being a Stockton suburb. Which means that’s about all it has going for it.

All snarkiness aside, Riverbank has the 2nd lowest home values in the metro Stockton area, where the median price is $219,700. To put that into perspective, in Brentwood, the median income is $94,130, which is the best in the area.

Riverbank has an unemployment rate of 12.0% which ranks 3rd worst.

6. Oakdale

Oakdale, California

Source: Public domain

Population: 21,796
Unemployment Rate: 13.5%
Median Home Price: $251,100
Median Income: $51,654
More on Oakdale: Data | Jobs

Oakdale has 21,796 residents that probably know it’s a pretty crummy place to live when you look at the data. (Or, if you’ve ever been there, you don’t need to look at the data.)

Incomes are towards the bottom and the poverty rate sits at 16.1%.

7. Manteca

Manteca, California

Population: 73,570
Unemployment Rate: 11.9%
Median Home Price: $274,200
Median Income: $64,502
More on Manteca: Data | Jobs

Ah, Manteca. You rank as the 7th worst place to live around Stockton.

It’s the place with the 4th most out of work residents in the Stockton metro area (11.9%).

8. Rio Vista

Rio Vista, California

Population: 8,055
Unemployment Rate: 8.3%
Median Home Price: $269,200
Median Income: $59,050
More on Rio Vista: Data | Jobs

Rio Vista is a city about 25.5 miles from Stockton, but Stockton probably wishes it was further away. It ranks as the 8th worst burb for 2018.

You’d be hard pressed to find a worse place to live. Rio Vista has the 7th most uninsured people, 4th worst incomes, and has the 11th highest unemployment rate (8.3%) in the entire Stockton metro area.

Homes only cost $269,200 for a reason. That’s cheap for Stockton standards.

9. Antioch

Antioch, California

Source: Public domain

Population: 108,675
Unemployment Rate: 9.7%
Median Home Price: $291,400
Median Income: $65,530
More on Antioch: Data | Jobs

If you absolutely have to live near Stockton, then Antioch might be a place for you to consider as it’s only the 9th worst Stockton suburb.

About 9.7% of residents are out of work.

10. Oakley

Oakley, California

Source: Public domain

Population: 38,968
Unemployment Rate: 8.4%
Median Home Price: $324,000
Median Income: $82,584
More on Oakley: Data | Jobs

Rounding out the ten worst Stockton suburbs to call home is Oakley.

Located 20.6 miles outside the city, Oakleys is a real pit when you look at the data. Its residents have the 10th highest unemployment rate (8.4%), and poverty is far above the area average.

The areas around Stockton where the dream is more of a nightmare for 2018

Well there you have it — the worst of the ‘burbs surrounding Stockton with Modesto casting itself ahead of the pack.

As we mentioned earlier, the suburbs around Stockton aren’t all bad. Brentwood takes the cake as the best place to live around Stockton.

For more California reading, check out:

Detailed List Of The Worst Stockton Suburbs

Rank City Population Unemployment Rate Median Home Price Median Income
1 Modesto 208,512 13.6% $208,000 $50,996
2 Lathrop 20,331 10.9% $250,400 $65,699
3 Galt 24,848 10.5% $239,000 $63,681
4 Lodi 63,842 9.7% $252,900 $51,139
5 Riverbank 23,761 12.0% $219,700 $61,870
6 Oakdale 21,796 13.5% $251,100 $51,654
7 Manteca 73,570 11.9% $274,200 $64,502
8 Rio Vista 8,055 8.3% $269,200 $59,050
9 Antioch 108,675 9.7% $291,400 $65,530
10 Oakley 38,968 8.4% $324,000 $82,584
11 Escalon 7,382 2.5% $256,800 $65,258
12 Tracy 86,382 9.2% $332,300 $81,022
13 Lincoln 45,675 7.0% $363,300 $76,354
14 Ripon 14,971 4.9% $352,500 $79,354
15 Brentwood 56,923 7.4% $428,500 $94,130

Like RoadSnacks on Facebook:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *