Like all states, South Dakota has certain places that are going on hard times. These South Dakota places have an above-average percentage of people living in poverty, out of work, or not making as much as they should be.
Even as the economy continues to improve, it’s worthwhile to look at the places in each state struggling to make ends meet. So we set our sites on locating the poorest places in South Dakota.
To do so, we used Saturday Night Science to analyze the newest Census data from the American Community Survey for the 39 cities in South Dakota with more than 2,000 people.
Table Of Contents: Top Ten | Methodology | Summary | Table
The 10 Poorest Places In South Dakota For 2025:
- Hot Springs
- Sisseton
- Winner
- Vermillion
- Huron
- Flandreau
- Mitchell
- Mobridge
- Spearfish
- Milbank
What’s the poorest city in South Dakota? According to the facts, Hot Springs is the poorest place in South Dakota for 2025.
This isn’t a commentary on the people that live there or the vibrant culture and traditions of these places. Instead, it’s just a look at the facts.
For more South Dakota reading, check out:
- Best Places To Live In South Dakota
- Cheapest Places To Live In South Dakota
- Most Dangerous Cities In South Dakota
- The poorest states in the US
- The poorest cities in the US
The 10 Poorest Cities In South Dakota For 2025
1. Hot Springs
/10
Population: 3,506
Rank Last Year: 1 (No Change)
Median Income: $49,688 (3rd lowest)
Poverty Rate: 27.9% (highest)
People In Poverty: 976
More on Hot Springs:
Hot Springs, unfortunately, ranks as the poorest place in South Dakota thanks to combination of low pay and and a lack of jobs.
The city of 3,506 people averages the 3rd lowest median household income in South Dakota and the highest poverty rate. At the very least, the cost of living ranks in the bottom 15% of place in the state, so things like housing are relatively affordable.
2. Sisseton
/10
Population: 2,593
Rank Last Year: 2 (No Change)
Median Income: $44,477 (lowest)
Poverty Rate: 22.0% (4th highest)
People In Poverty: 571
More on Sisseton:
The second poorest city in South Dakota is Sisseton.
The city ranks as having the 4th highest incidence of poverty and lowest median household income. However, the unemployment rate ‘only’ ranks as the 2nd highest in the Mount Rushmore State.
3. Winner
/10
Population: 2,900
Rank Last Year: 4 (Up 1)
Median Income: $47,132 (2nd lowest)
Poverty Rate: 24.8% (3rd highest)
People In Poverty: 720
More on Winner:
Placing as the third poorest city, Winner’s median income ranks as the 2nd lowest.
And that’s a sign that there’s a relatively substantial jump in the quality of the economy from second to third place on our list. The poverty rate is 24.84% and ranks near the bottom of places in the state.
But what makes up for the relatively low incomes of the city is its low cost of living. The income you do make here goes further than in most parts of the Mount Rushmore State.
4. Vermillion
/10
Population: 11,800
Rank Last Year: 3 (Down 1)
Median Income: $52,815 (6th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 25.1% (2nd highest)
People In Poverty: 2,961
More on Vermillion: Data
Vermillion ranks as the fourth poorest place in South Dakota.
The town ranks as having the 6th lowest median household income and the 2nd highest incidence of poverty in the state.
That being said, there’s still a ton of cultural diversity in the city as it hosts many events throughout the year.
5. Huron
/10
Population: 14,347
Rank Last Year: 16 (Up 11)
Median Income: $51,556 (5th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 16.4% (7th highest)
People In Poverty: 2,351
More on Huron: Data
The fifth poorest city in South Dakota is Huron.
The city ranks as having the 5th lowest median income in the state. However, an extremely low cost of living prevents a good number of folks from living in poverty as the poverty rate only ranks as the 7th highest in South Dakota.
Still not the best news for Huron.
6. Flandreau
/10
Population: 2,291
Rank Last Year: 7 (Up 1)
Median Income: $56,458 (8th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 18.2% (6th highest)
People In Poverty: 417
More on Flandreau:
Flandreau ranks as the sixth poorest place in the Mount Rushmore State.
It ranks as having the 6th highest incidence of poverty and the 10th highest unemployment rate.
7. Mitchell
/10
Population: 15,637
Rank Last Year: 5 (Down 2)
Median Income: $56,374 (7th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 14.2% (10th highest)
People In Poverty: 2,212
More on Mitchell: Data
Mitchell places as the seventh poorest city in South Dakota.
The city of over 15,637 ranks as having the 10th highest incidence of poverty in the state. However, it has a very low cost of living which helps to pay the bills each month.
8. Mobridge
/10
Population: 2,928
Rank Last Year: 6 (Down 2)
Median Income: $61,556 (15th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 20.2% (5th highest)
People In Poverty: 591
More on Mobridge:
Mobridge ranks as the eighth poorest city in South Dakota.
The big issue for the town is the unemployment rate which ranks as one of the highest in the state.
9. Spearfish
/10
Population: 12,551
Rank Last Year: 11 (Up 2)
Median Income: $59,731 (12th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 15.2% (9th highest)
People In Poverty: 1,907
More on Spearfish: Data
Spearfish couldn’t stay out of the top ten poorest places in South Dakota; it ranks number 9.
While the median income is the 12th lowest, there are a substantial number of people that live below the poverty line. Overall, Spearfish ranks as having the 9th most people living in poverty of all the places we analyzed in South Dakota.
10. Milbank
/10
Population: 3,513
Rank Last Year: 23 (Up 13)
Median Income: $58,462 (10th lowest)
Poverty Rate: 13.6% (11th highest)
People In Poverty: 478
More on Milbank:
And rounding out the top ten poorest cities in South Dakota is Milbank.
The city of 3,513 people ranks in the bottom 20% for both median income and poverty rate in the Mount Rushmore State.
Methodology: How We Determined The Poorest Places In South Dakota for 2025
The first thing that comes to most people’s minds when they think about determining the poorest places is to simply the poverty rate. That is, the number of people living below a federally established level of income for a household of a certain size.
However, we don’t think that one statistic wholly encompasses what it means to be one of the “poorest places”. So we used Saturday Night Science to look at this set of criteria from the newly released 2019-2023 American Community Survey:
- Poverty Level
- Median Household Income
After we collected the data for all 39 places with more than 2,000 people in South Dakota, we ranked each place from 1 to 39 for each of the criteria, with 1 being the poorest.
We then averaged all the rankings for a place into a “Poor Score” with the place having the lowest overall Poor Score, Hot Springs, crowned the “Poorest Place In South Dakota For 2025”.
This report has been updated for 2025, which is our tenth time ranking the poorest places in South Dakota.
Summary: The Poorest Cities In South Dakota For 2025
Like we said earlier, when we set out to identify the poorest places in South Dakota, we weren’t sure what we’d encounter, but it ended up being some of the best places to live in South Dakota.
When you look at the data, the cities and places mentioned above meet the criteria for being at the very bottom of the income ladder for everyone that lives there.
If you’re curious enough, here are the richest cities in South Dakota, according to data:
-
Richest: Harrisburg
2nd Richest: Brandon
3rd Richest: Tea
For more South Dakota reading, check out:
- Richest Cities In South Dakota
- Safest Places In South Dakota
- Worst Places To Live In South Dakota
- Most Expensive Places To Live In South Dakota
Detailed List Of The Poorest Places To Live In South Dakota
| Rank | City | Population | Poverty Rate | Median Income | People In Poverty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hot Springs | 3,506 | 27.9% | $49,688 | 976 |
| 2 | Sisseton | 2,593 | 22.0% | $44,477 | 571 |
| 3 | Winner | 2,900 | 24.8% | $47,132 | 720 |
| 4 | Vermillion | 11,800 | 25.1% | $52,815 | 2,961 |
| 5 | Huron | 14,347 | 16.4% | $51,556 | 2,351 |
| 6 | Flandreau | 2,291 | 18.2% | $56,458 | 417 |
| 7 | Mitchell | 15,637 | 14.2% | $56,374 | 2,212 |
| 8 | Mobridge | 2,928 | 20.2% | $61,556 | 591 |
| 9 | Spearfish | 12,551 | 15.2% | $59,731 | 1,907 |
| 10 | Milbank | 3,513 | 13.6% | $58,462 | 478 |
| 11 | Brookings | 23,710 | 16.1% | $61,979 | 3,814 |
| 12 | Sturgis | 7,111 | 9.0% | $51,101 | 638 |
| 13 | Madison | 6,158 | 11.2% | $62,180 | 690 |
| 14 | Aberdeen | 28,297 | 12.9% | $63,715 | 3,641 |
| 15 | Rapid City | 76,836 | 13.3% | $65,712 | 10,188 |
| 16 | Watertown | 22,859 | 10.7% | $62,721 | 2,443 |
| 17 | Lead | 2,997 | 7.3% | $57,348 | 219 |
| 18 | Yankton | 15,501 | 10.9% | $69,071 | 1,691 |
| 19 | Springfield | 2,073 | 7.2% | $59,063 | 148 |
| 20 | Redfield | 2,230 | 7.3% | $60,586 | 162 |
| 21 | North Sioux City | 3,018 | 13.4% | $76,481 | 405 |
| 22 | Pierre | 14,008 | 10.3% | $74,053 | 1,440 |
| 23 | Belle Fourche | 5,741 | 7.1% | $59,920 | 407 |
| 24 | Sioux Falls | 197,642 | 9.6% | $74,714 | 19,052 |
| 25 | Chamberlain | 2,621 | 9.7% | $75,000 | 252 |
| 26 | Box Elder | 12,457 | 7.4% | $73,698 | 923 |
| 27 | Lennox | 2,587 | 9.7% | $76,477 | 250 |
| 28 | Custer | 2,148 | 9.8% | $80,188 | 210 |
| 29 | Canton | 3,060 | 6.6% | $65,500 | 201 |
| 30 | Volga | 2,246 | 7.5% | $75,417 | 168 |
| 31 | Beresford | 2,437 | 5.6% | $71,017 | 135 |
| 32 | Elk Point | 2,391 | 7.2% | $83,250 | 173 |
| 33 | Summerset | 2,978 | 9.1% | $115,197 | 271 |
| 34 | Fort Pierre | 2,534 | 1.8% | $74,732 | 46 |
| 35 | Dell Rapids | 3,947 | 6.2% | $101,250 | 245 |
| 36 | Hartford | 3,412 | 6.1% | $95,426 | 208 |
| 37 | Tea | 6,339 | 4.4% | $104,643 | 280 |
| 38 | Brandon | 10,996 | 2.6% | $104,806 | 286 |
| 39 | Harrisburg | 7,790 | 1.5% | $101,534 | 119 |