These Are The 10 Poorest Cities In South Dakota For 2019

South Dakota brings to mind images of Pierre, beautiful landscapes, and some of the best people you’ll find in the good ole US of A.

However, like all states, South Dakota has certain places that are going on hard times. These places have an above average percent of people that are living in poverty, out of work, or not making as much as they should be.

With all the talk about income inequality going on around the country, we thought it prudent to take a look at the places in each state that are struggling to make it even as the economy continues to improve. So we set our sites on bringing attention to the places in South Dakota that could use a helping hand.

To do so, we analyzed the newest Census data from the American Community Survey for the 38 places in South Dakota with more than 2,000 people.

We were left with this set of the ten poorest places in the Mount Rushmore State for 2019:

1. Vermillion (Photos)
2. Sisseton (Photos)
3. Flandreau (Photos)
4. Lead (Photos)
5. Yankton (Photos)
6. Madison (Photos)
7. Mitchell (Photos)
8. Belle Fourche (Photos)
9. Brookings (Photos)
10. Spearfish (Photos)

Again, this isn’t a commentary on the people that live there or the vibrant culture and traditions of these places. Instead, it’s just a look at the facts.

And according to the facts, Vermillion is the poorest place in South Dakota for 2019.

Rich people not your cup of tea? Feel free to check out the richest places in South Dakota or the most dangerous.

For more on how we calculated the top ten, and for more information about these places, read on.

If you’re looking for something more national, check out the poorest states in America or the poorest cities in America.

For more South Dakota reading, check out:

• 10 Best Places To Live In South Dakota
• 10 Cheapest Places To Live In South Dakota
• 10 Most Dangerous Cities In South Dakota

How We Determined The Poorest Places In South Dakota for 2019

The first thing that comes to most people’s minds when they think about determining the poorest places is to simply the poverty rate. That is, the number of people living below a federally established level of income for a household of a certain size.

However, we don’t think that one statistic wholly encompasses what it means to be one of the “poorest places”. So we looked at this set of criteria from the newly released 2013-2017 American Community Survey:

• Poverty Level
• Median Household Income adjusted for the cost of living
• Unemployment Rate

The “median household income adjusted for the cost of living” attempts to gauge how expensive it is to live in a place and how that impacts the quality of life. For example, a town might have fewer people living below the official poverty line, but the cost of living is so high they’d still feel poor.

The unemployment rate tries to capture the prospects for improvement in the city or town. If more people are employed, the brighter the future looks and vice versa.

After we collected the data for all 38 places with more than 2,000 people in South Dakota, we ranked each place from 1 to 38 for each of the criteria, with 1 being the poorest.

We then averaged all the rankings for a place into a “Poor Score” with the place having the lowest overall Poor Score, Vermillion, crowned the “Poorest Place In South Dakota For 2019”.

You can learn more about the top ten below or skip to the end to see the rankings for all 38 places.

Vermillion, unfortunately, ranks as the poorest place in South Dakota thanks to combination of low pay and and a lack of jobs.

The city of 10,687 people averages the 1st lowest median household income in South Dakota and the 1st highest poverty rate. At the very least, the cost of living ranks in the bottom 15% of place in the state, so things like housing are relatively affordable.

The second poorest city in South Dakota is Sisseton.

The city ranks as having the 3rd highest incidence of poverty and 3rd lowest median household income. However, the unemployment rate ‘only’ ranks as the 1st highest in the Mount Rushmore State.

Placing as the third poorest city, Flandreau’s median income ranks as the 10th lowest.

And that’s a sign that there’s a relatively substantial jump in the quality of the economy from second to third place on our list. The poverty rate is 20.6% and ranks near the bottom of places in the state.

But what makes up for the relatively low incomes of the city is its low cost of living. The income you do make here goes further than in most parts of the Mount Rushmore State.

Lead ranks as the fourth poorest place in South Dakota.

The town ranks as having the 9th lowest median household income and the 14th highest incidence of poverty in the state.

That being said, there’s still a ton of cultural diversity in the city as it hosts many events throughout the year.

The fifth poorest city in South Dakota is Yankton.

The city ranks as having the 5th lowest median income in the state. However, an extremely low cost of living prevents a good number of folks from living in poverty as the poverty rate only ranks as the 8th highest in South Dakota.

Still not the best news for Yankton.

Madison ranks as the sixth poorest place in the Mount Rushmore State.

It ranks as having the 4th highest incidence of poverty and the 6th highest unemployment rate.

Mitchell places as the seventh poorest city in South Dakota.

The city of over 15,566 ranks as having the 12th highest incidence of poverty in the state. However, it has a very low cost of living which helps to pay the bills each month.

Belle Fourche ranks as the eighth poorest city in South Dakota.

The big issue for the town is the unemployment rate which ranks as the 13th highest in the state.

Brookings couldn’t stay out of the top ten poorest places in South Dakota; it ranks number 9.

While the median income is the 13th lowest, there are a substantial number of people that live below the poverty line. Overall, Brookings ranks as having the 7th most people living in poverty of all the places we analyzed in South Dakota.

And rounding out the top ten poorest cities in South Dakota is Spearfish.

The city of 11,300 people ranks in the bottom 20% for both median income and poverty rate in the Mount Rushmore State.

Next 10 Cities

There You Have It – The Poorest Places In South Dakota For 2019

Like we said earlier, when we set out to identify the poorest places in South Dakota, we weren’t sure what we’d encounter, but it ended up being some of the best places to live in South Dakota.

When you look at the data, the cities and places mentioned above meet the criteria for being at the very bottom of the income ladder for everyone that lives there.

If you’re curious enough, here are the richest cities in South Dakota, according to data:

Richest: Harrisburg
2nd Richest: Hartford
3rd Richest: Beresford

For more South Dakota reading, check out:

• These Are The 10 Richest Cities In South Dakota
• 10 Safest Places In South Dakota
• 10 Worst Places To Live In South Dakota

Detailed List Of The Poorest Places To Live In South Dakota